Maritime and Logistics News
  • Maritime & Ocean News
    • Container Shipping News
    • Dry Bulk Shipping News
    • Breakbulk Shipping News
    • Chemical Shipping News
    • Crude Oil Shipping News
    • Cruise Shipping News
    • Fishing News
    • Freight Forwarders News
    • LNG & LPG Shipping News
    • Multimodal Transport News
    • Railway News
    • Straits News
    • Trucking News
  • Global Ports News
    • Port Accidents News
    • Port Congestion News
    • Port Infrastructure News
    • Port Strike News
    • Schedules News
  • Air Cargo News
    • Air Cargo Carriers News
    • Air Freight Forwarder News
    • Airports News
  • Logistics News
    • Supply Chain News
    • Warehousing News
    • Cold Storage News
    • Logistics Parks News
  • Vessels News
    • Bunkering News
    • Incidents News
    • Offshore News
    • Pilotage News
    • Piracy News
    • Services News
    • Ship Breaking News
    • Shipbuilding News
  • Tech. & Sustainability News
    • Green Logistics News
    • Responsibility Projects News
    • Useful Maritime Associations News
  • Languages
Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Advertisement
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Air Cargo Carriers News

Initial reactions to rail merger plan mostly skeptical or negative

December 23, 2025
in Air Cargo Carriers News, Air Cargo News, Air Freight Forwarder News, Airports News, Breakbulk Shipping News, Bunkering News, Chemical Shipping News, Cold Storage News, Container Shipping News, Crude Oil Shipping News, Cruise Shipping News, Dry Bulk Shipping News, Fishing News, Freight Forwarders News, Freight Rates & Reports News, Global Ports News, Green Logistics News, Incidents News, LNG & LPG Shipping News, Logistics News, Logistics Parks News, Maritime & Logistics News, Maritime & Ocean News, Maritime Safety & Security News, Multimodal Transport News, Offshore News, Pilotage News, Piracy News, Port Accidents News, Port Congestion News, Port Infrastructure News, Port Strike News, Railway News, Responsibility Projects News, Ro-Ro Shipping News, Schedules News, Services News, Ship Breaking News, Shipbuilding News, Smart Development and Growth News, Straits News, Supply Chain News, Tech. & Sustainability News, Trucking News, Useful Maritime Associations News, Vessels News, Warehousing News
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Reactions to the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger filing began collecting shortly after the 6,992-page, four-volume document was released, with most expressing skepticism about the benefits of the first transcontinental merger.

Trade groups representing shippers, which had previously indicated concerns about the merger, renewed statements of opposition after the Dec. 19 filing by UP (NYSE: UNP) and NS (NYSE: NSC).

Chet Thompson, president and chief executive of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, said in a statement that while his group needs “competitive, efficient, and reliable rail networks … decades of bad service and price increases in the wake of freight rail consolidation leave us and other carload shippers highly skeptical of this merger. Unless the Surface Transportation Board can demonstrate conclusively that it will enhance competition across all modes of transport – especially between railroads – this merger application should be denied.”

Alliance for Chemical Distribution CEO Eric Byer’s statement said his organization “strongly opposes this merger proposal as it will expand monopolistic control of freight rail at the expense of America’s crucial chemical supply chain.”

The Fertilizer Institute’s statement said the fertilizer industry faces “a take-it-or-leave-it” approach from railroads, and seeks a balanced relationship between carriers and shippers. “While we are still reviewing [the] STB filing,” the statement reads, “it is difficult to see how any coast-to-coast merger would improve this imbalance or meet the standard set out in the Surface Transportation Board’s merger rules.”

The first elected official to weigh in was U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.). In a press release, she said, “Approving this merger would take us in the wrong direction – stifling competition, worsening service, and raising costs on consumers and businesses who are already facing growing headwinds because of the Trump Administration.”

A statement from U.S. Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said the railroads’ promise in the merger application “to significantly invest in a more efficient rail network, increase safety, and enhance competition is encouraging. However, with a merger of this size, I want to ensure the STB is deliberative in assessing what potential effects this would have on the system as a whole.”

Rival Canadian National (NYSE: CNI) in a statement said that the application “fails to demonstrate that the merger would enhance competition or generate significant public benefits that would require a merger. It falls well below both the 2001 and old merger rules set out by the Surface Transportation Board.

“Protecting competition is not optional, it is essential to keep costs down and the economy sound. The fact is that this merger would reduce rail transportation options for customers while creating a single entity that controls more than 40% of the U.S. freight rail market. Without real railroad competition, prices go up and consumers lose.”

Union reaction to the merger has been split.

The American Train Dispatchers Association cited confirmed job losses among dispatchers, potential relocation of its members in Atlanta, where NS headquarters are located, and what it called “unresolved safety and workforce concerns embedded in the merger application.” The application projects a net loss of 33 dispatching jobs.

“These job losses are not a coincidence,” ATDA President Ed Dowell said in a statement. “They are intentionally built into the merger plan and tied directly to expanding dispatcher territories and consolidating operational control by leveraging unregulated technologies. These cuts, driven by Wall Street, jeopardize the very safety and efficiency the railroads claim to improve. … [W]e will not support this merger as long as it is paid for at the expense of our members’ livelihoods or the safety of the general public.”

Subscribe to FreightWaves’ Rail e-newsletter and get the latest insights on rail freight right in your inbox.

Related coverage:

North Shore unveils US semiquincentennial locomotive

STB asks comments on ‘completeness’ of rail merger application

UP, NS: Merger will create 10,000 single-line service lanes, shift 105k truckloads to rail

BNSF CEO: Rail merger still a “significant threat” to economy, consumers

The post Initial reactions to rail merger plan mostly skeptical or negative appeared first on FreightWaves.

Tags: AndMergerRailStatementThe

Related Posts

Love’s factoring business gets bigger, buying trio of companies
Freight Forwarders News

Love’s factoring business gets bigger, buying trio of companies

December 23, 2025
ANA, Nippon Cargo Airlines begin to merge cargo businesses
Air Cargo Carriers News

ANA, Nippon Cargo Airlines begin to merge cargo businesses

December 23, 2025
North Shore unveils US semiquincentennial locomotive
Air Cargo Carriers News

North Shore unveils US semiquincentennial locomotive

December 23, 2025
Why container shipping refuses to return in the Red Sea?
Container Shipping News

Why container shipping refuses to return in the Red Sea?

December 23, 2025
Philadelphia’s Theobald becomes fourth major port chief to exit this year
Freight Forwarders News

Philadelphia’s Theobald becomes fourth major port chief to exit this year

December 23, 2025
SITC returns to Huanghai for six more 2,700 TEU ships
Container Shipping News

SITC returns to Huanghai for six more 2,700 TEU ships

December 23, 2025

Stay ahead in the dynamic world of maritime and logistics with our comprehensive news coverage. Explore the latest industry trends, breaking news, and insightful analyses. Your gateway to informed decision-making in shipping, trade, and logistics awaits.

Follow Us

Our Partners

shipstrack.com
E-tracking
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2020-2024 SeasNews - Shipping News & Magazine.

No Result
View All Result

© 2020-2024 SeasNews - Shipping News & Magazine.